So “normal” vaccines include live/dead virus components to train your body in making antibodies against them.
When you get the flu vaccine, you are getting the scientists best guess on what flu variant will be most predominant that season. They include dead parts of the flu virus and thus you get a consistent dosage (a known amount of the virus particles) and your body can train itself to handle those particles, thus building up antibodies and even long-term “memory” (our bodies are really good at this!)
Here’s a good article (pre-pandemic, which is good) on how that works.
But along comes these new “vaccines”, or as I like to call them: Experimental Biological Agents.
These are different. These include “instructions” for our bodies to generate spike proteins, which are the virus particles in SARS-CoV-2.
So these “vaccines” are, in effect, software instructions to rework our own cells to become manufacturing plants for the spike proteins.
And there seems to be some data that suggest that the spike proteins created by these “vaccines” can do some nasty things: get into the blood stream and cause clotting, cross the blood-brain barrier, get into reproductive organs, especially the female reproductive organs, and maybe more.
See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100279/, specifically this bit from it:
However, recent reports have raised some skepticism as to the biologic actions of the spike protein and the types of antibodies produced. One paper reported that certain antibodies in the blood of infected patients appear to change the shape of the spike protein so as to make it more likely to bind to cells, while other papers showed that the spike protein by itself (without being part of the corona virus) can damage endothelial cells and disrupt the blood-brain barrier.
I get that there is pressure in The Narrative to discount these concerns, and thus articles like this one are easy to find, which basically say “no, that’s anti-vaxx sentiment. The spike proteins don’t do that.”
Conclusion
I know I’m biased. I know that others, like David Gorski are also biased but in the other way.
But to me it seems that these generated spike proteins via mRNA codes or adenovirus triggers are the most logical explanation for that OpenVAERS explosion and the growing cases of adverse events.
To me, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
The generated spike proteins from these “vaccines” walk like a toxic spike protein, quack like a toxic spike protein, I’m calling them toxic.
Further Conclusions
I know the intention of these “vaccines” is to have the body generate spike proteins in a “harmless” way and yet have them be “harmful enough” so that our bodies react and generate antibodies. So it’s a fine line, and probably why SARS-CoV-1 mRNA “vaccines” were scrapped… too hard to get that right. What makes us think its been gotten right this time around (especially with so little long-term testing)?
If the “vaccines”, in effect, deliver a potentially toxic payload (albeit indirectly, via encoding), that makes them a biological agent in my estimation.
Update - 2022-05-19
Well well well… looks like my thoughts here were spot on. Nothing like validation from the inventor of mRNA technology himself: